ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Machine learning-based integration of respiratory oscillometry and spirometry for predicting clinical outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing respiratory function in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is challenging due to the effort-dependent nature of traditional spirometry. While respiratory oscillometry offers a passive alternative, its clinical utility in predicting clinical status remains underexplored. This study evaluates the efficacy of integrating spirometric and respiratory oscillometric indices through machine learning (ML) to predict ambulatory status and the requirement for bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in SMA patients. We retrospectively analyzed forty-five patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of SMA. To address data imbalance, we utilized the SMOTETomek technique and validated Random Forest models through leave-one-out cross-validation. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was used to interpret the contribution of individual physiological markers. In univariate logistic regression, forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and forced expiratory flow at 75% of vital capacity (FEF75) were significant predictors for walking support. FEF25, FEF50, FEF75, and FEF 25-75 were associated with the requirement for BiPAP use. None of the respiratory oscillometric parameters reached statistical significance in regression models. However, ML models achieved high predictive accuracy, with SMOTETomek improving BiPAP requirement recall from 0.00 to 1.00. SHAP analysis revealed that respiratory oscillometry gained significant predictive weight that traditional models overlooked. R20Hz emerged as a key predictor for ambulatory status, while R5-20 Hz was identified as a decisive feature for predicting the BiPAP use.
conclusionThe integration of effort-independent respiratory oscillometry with traditional spirometry via ML has the potential to enhance risk stratification in SMA. WHAT IS KNOWN: • SMA requires lung function monitoring, but traditional spirometry is challenging due to the need for forceful expiratory maneuvers. • Respiratory oscillometry provides an effort-independent assessment of respiratory mechanics through tidal breathing. WHAT IS NEW: • Machine learning successfully integrates effort-independent respiratory oscillometry with spirometry to significantly enhance clinical predictions in SMA. • It identifies R20Hz and R5-20 Hz as critical physiological markers for predicting ambulatory status and the requirement for respiratory support, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42113282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.