ArticleOecologia2026
Linear features affect pollination success in experimental plant assemblages.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Linear features, such as road verges and hedgerows can function as corridors for pollinators during foraging. Studies have shown that these features can enhance the foraging movement of pollinators such as bees, increasing the pollination success of bee pollinated plants. However, it remains unclear if these effects extend to communities of plants pollinated by other insect pollinators. We conducted a field experiment where we measured the pollination of phytometer plant assemblages linked by linear features. We constructed six 30 m artificial linear features in both urban and rural meadows in Southwest England, and placed plant assemblages at either end of these artificial features, comparing these to plant assemblages without links. Each plant assemblage had seven species known to attract different insect pollinators including bees, flies, and moths. We evaluated the self-incompatibility of plants and used seed set to measure pollination success. Artificial linear features significantly improved the pollination of three bee pollinated species, whereas fly and moth pollinated species were less affected. Despite these differences among pollinator groups, the presence of linear features increased overall seed set in assemblages. We suggest that linear features likely play an important role in maintaining pollination for certain plant species, depending on which insect groups are their key pollinators. This result highlights the importance of considering community-level impacts of corridors on pollination. Given the critical role of bees as pollinators, linear features can provide a practical means to evaluate the ecological functions of habitat corridors, but alternative approaches may be required for flies or moths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42113280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.