ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Comprehensive analysis of six MED15::TFE3 renal cell carcinomas including two novel solid MED15::TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, highlighting their morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular differences from their cystic counterparts.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2017, the first case of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with MED15 as a novel fusion partner gene was reported. Since then, vast majority of MED15::TFE3 RCCs were reported to have characteristic extensively cystic appearance, with the septa being lined by tumor cells with optically clear cytoplasm and inconspicuous nucleoli, morphologically mimicking multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential and clear cell RCC with extensive cystic changes. IHC stains are helpful in such diagnostic scenario, as MED15::TFE3 RCCs are negative for carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and are positive for melanocytic markers and TFE3. However, the current MED15::TFE3 RCCs case series includes two solid MED15::TFE3 RCCs, which are morphologically, immunohistochemically and molecularly different from the conventional MED15::TFE3 RCCs that are extensively cystic. One case is purely solid with nests of tumor cells with clear cytoplasm mimicking clear cell RCC. This purely solid MED15::TFE3 RCC is positive for TFE3, focally positive for CAIX with box-like membranous staining, and negative for Melan A. Another case is mostly solid and tubulopapillary with minor cystic components, is positive for TFE3, and negative for Melan A and CAIX. The non-cystic MED15::TFE3 RCCs also have unique fusion transcripts that are different from those seen in the conventional MED15::TFE3 RCCs. The phenotypic variation of MED15::TFE3 RCCs may be due to the property of the fusion transcripts, although additional studies are required to validate this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.