ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Complexity matching: adaptive strong anticipation enhances motor coordination.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coordination of movement between pairs of individuals or in groups is a routine aspect of social behavior. Successful coordination is predicated on adaptation of movement timing by the individuals forming the group. The purpose of the present study is to examine whether motor coordination between dyads reflects weak or strong anticipation. Weak anticipation is reflected in local adjustments to motor behavior to account for prediction errors. Strong anticipation reflects the knowledge of the long-range statistics of the environment (e.g., variability in movement dynamics) in order to predict and coordinate with future events. Previous studies of rhythmic behavior have demonstrated that movement dynamics exhibit long-range correlations and complexity, suggesting that strong anticipation could play a role in coordination. We investigated two finger tapping coordination tasks, synchronization and syncopation, with different types of on-screen responses between two individuals. The results indicate that the timing of motor action exhibits long-range correlations reflected in measures of complexity (Hurst exponents). When two individuals coordinate their motor behavior, they can exhibit adaptive strong anticipation by complexity matching, more prominently in syncopated than in synchronized motor coordination. During syncopation, individuals strongly synchronize their tapping intervals when provided mutual on-screen responses. Matching of tapping intervals in syncopation is not fully explained by prediction error correction, but instead mutual adaptation and the emergence of coordinated dynamics. In synchronization, coordination always reflects a leader and follower, even in mutual response conditions, suggesting a dominant role for weak anticipation. We probed the brain network dynamics underlying strong and weak anticipation by functional connectivity analysis of simultaneous EEG recordings. Graph-theoretic analysis revealed distinct patterns of hubs formed in occipital/parietal regions in syncopation and over the frontal cortex in synchronization. Motor coordination between individuals is supported by distinct brain networks during strong and weak anticipation, with more precise coordination facilitated by strong anticipation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42113238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.