SynthesisPediatric surgery international2026
Selective non-operative management of post-appendectomy abscesses in children: a comprehensive systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-appendectomy intra-abdominal abscess remains a common complication following pediatric appendicitis. Although drainage has traditionally been considered standard treatment, increasing evidence suggests selected patients may be successfully managed with antibiotics alone. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251075191). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 20, 2025. Eligible studies included pediatric patients (0-18 years) with post-appendectomy abscess managed with antibiotic vs. invasive drainage. The primary outcome was failure of first-line treatment requiring escalation. Secondary outcomes included recurrence and length of hospital stay. Ten observational studies involving 363 pediatric patients were included (152 drainage, 211 conservative). Treatment success was 80.9% with drainage and 89.1% with antibiotics. Pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in treatment success (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.95-1.05) or recurrence (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.57-1.74). Drainage was associated with longer hospital stays (MD 3.40 days; 95% CI 0.65-6.14; p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent findings. All included studies demonstrated a serious risk of bias due to confounding by indication. An antibiotics-first approach appears viable for clinically stable pediatric patients, achieving comparable outcomes with shorter hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42113215What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.