ArticlePsychological research2026
Visual attention towards virtual humans as a function of spatial distance and emotional expression: an eye-tracking study.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During social interactions, the way people regulate the space between each other (i.e., the interpersonal distance) reflects the type and quality of the relationship existing between the interactants. Shorter interpersonal distances are for intimate relationships; larger interpersonal distances are for formal social interactions. Thus, we spontaneously choose the appropriate interpersonal distance to feel comfortable and avoid distress. Moreover, when interacting with other people or the environment, the space surrounding the body acts as a protective buffer against potential threats: this space is larger in unsafe situations, smaller in safe situations. Consistently, stimuli entering this area receive close attention and trigger approach or avoidance actions depending on the perceived level of danger. Therefore, one might wonder where people focus their gaze during social interactions to identify and appropriately react to the intentions of others, depending on spatial distance. Using eye-tracking technology in immersive virtual reality, this study sought to address this question by assessing how individuals shift their visual attention to different body parts as a function of the spatial distance (near, middle, far) and facial expression (happy, angry, neutral) of the interactants. Results showed that at near distances the gaze focuses on the faces of the interactant, while at far distances the whole body acquires importance. In the middle space, visual attention is especially drawn to angry interactants, with a focus on action-relevant effectors (i.e., arms). Therefore, the data suggest that spatial distances in social interactions modulate visual attention to specific body parts of the interactant to acquire information useful for preparing appropriate responses, especially when faced with a potential threat: far distances prompt the gathering of information about others (more attention to their whole body); near distances prioritize information about others' dispositions toward us (more attention to the face); middle distances facilitate preparation for action (more attention to effectors).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.