ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Interacting Effects of Gender and Workplace Conflict on Subjective Social Status and the Mediating Role of Professional Benefits in Registered Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objectives of this study were to examine whether there is a relationship between workplace conflict and subjective social status and to explore whether gender serves as a moderating variable and perceived professional benefits act as a mediating variable in this relationship.
methodsData were derived from a sample of 8575 registered nurses across 29 hospitals in Shanghai. We examined gender differences in the relationship between workplace conflict and nurses' subjective social status by employing a multilinear regression model that incorporated the interaction between gender and workplace conflict. Additionally, we explored whether professional benefits differently mediated the relationship between workplace conflict and subjective social status for male and female nurses through gender-specific mediation analyses.
resultsThe association between workplace conflict and subjective social status differed by gender (p < 0.001). Female nurses who experienced workplace conflict demonstrated a reduced subjective social status (β = -0.63, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.47, p < 0.001), with their subjective social status scores further diminishing as the frequency of conflict increased (β = -0.65, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.52, p for trend < 0.001). Conversely, among male nurses, a positive correlation was observed (β = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.06, p for trend = 0.028). Among female nurses, the direct association between workplace conflict and the subjective social status score was statistically significant (β = -0.37, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.25, p < 0.001), and an indirect effect mediated through professional benefits was also observed (β = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.36, p < 0.001). The proportion of mediation was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.45 to 0.64, p < 0.001).
conclusionsGender plays a significant interactive role in the relationship between workplace conflict and nurses' subjective social status. Among female nurses, professional benefits function as a partial mediator. Accordingly, it is recommended that healthcare institutions address the concerns and needs of female nurses by enhancing their professional benefits to increase their subjective social status. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Managers can improve nurses' subjective social status by increasing their sense of professional benefits. When encountering workplace conflict, healthcare managers could consider involving male nurses in conflict management and encouraging male nurses who have successfully resolved conflicts to share their experiences in conflict management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.