ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Evaluation of the local tolerance and systemic safety of a novel intravaginal probiotic product in cows.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of a novel intravaginal probiotic product on uterine health in postpartum dairy cows.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its discovery, the microbiota has been increasingly recognised for its role in maintaining health and contributing to various disease conditions. In the reproductive tract, microbial populations can significantly influence endometrial health, internal homeostasis, and fertility. The preservation or restoration of a balanced microbiota through appropriate probiotic products may support reproductive health; in addition, candidate probiotics must be demonstrated to be safe for use. The aim of this study was to assess the local tolerance and systemic safety of a novel intravaginal probiotic product in cows. Twenty-four animals were enrolled and assigned to four groups: single-dose, three-, and five-fold dose of the test product, and a placebo group receiving excipients only. Physical examination and evaluation of the vaginal mucosa were conducted prior to each treatment, one day after and one and two weeks after the final probiotic administration. Blood and urine samples were collected before treatment and following treatment: one day after the last administration of intravaginal probiotic and again two weeks post-treatment. Blood haptoglobin, serum amyloid A, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, and beta-hydroxybutyrate were measured to assess inflammatory and metabolic responses, and differences over time and between groups were statistically analysed. No dose-dependent systemic changes were observed; however, transient, time-related alterations were noted across all groups, including controls. The investigational probiotic product was well tolerated both locally and systemically, with tolerability comparable across all groups, including the placebo. These data establish a safety profile in healthy cows and support further investigation of this product in studies focusing on efficacy and microbiome modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.