ArticlePsychological research2026
Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In multi-talker environments, inhibitory deficits may increase interference from auditory distractors and impair selective listening. To investigate whether age-related inhibitory deficits contribute to reduced control of auditory attention, we tested 45 younger and 45 older adults in a cued selective listening task. In each trial, a visual cue guided attention toward one of three sound sources (A, B, or C). Unlike previous studies that included immediate (n-1) location repetitions, the present task required switching on every trial. Participants categorised the magnitude of a spoken digit presented at the cued location while ignoring a simultaneous distractor at a different location. To assess target-distractor segregation, we measured performance costs when distractors elicited incongruent responses compared to congruent responses (congruency effect). We manipulated the n-2 location sequence to test whether returning to a previously attended location results in a cost (inhibition) or a benefit (facilitation). Results showed no age-related differences in the congruency effect, suggesting comparable target-distractor segregation across age groups. When participants switched attention to a previously attended location (ABA) relative to a new one (CBA), an n-2 location repetition benefit was observed, suggesting similar facilitation across groups. Older adults, in addition to general slowing, showed an n-2 location repetition benefit in error rates. Overall, these findings provide no evidence for an age-related inhibitory deficit during selective listening, even when accounting for age-related hearing loss. Instead, they suggest that auditory attention remains largely preserved in healthy aging, with older adults effectively resisting distractor interference and flexibly orienting attention across different sound sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.