ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2026
How Culture Enables Practice: Facilitators and Barriers to the Use of Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Pediatric Anesthesia.
Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Culture Enables Practice: Facilitators and Barriers to the Use of Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Pediatric Anesthesia.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTotal intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in children has gained popularity due to potential advantages, including decreased respiratory adverse events, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and emergence agitation. British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) has a reputation for TIVA use, training, and advocacy, including intravenous induction.
aimTo inform practice change and education by exploring how institutional culture impacts TIVA adoption, particularly regarding intravenous cannulation in awake children.
methodsCurrent and former BCCH anesthesiologists and trainees were surveyed and interviewed about TIVA practices at BCCH and at their current institutions. The survey covered demographics, practice settings, past and current methods for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, factors contributing to technique selection, TIVA barriers and facilitators, and implementation factors. Semi-structured interviews conducted with a subset of participants were analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.
resultsTwenty-six participants completed the survey: 21 attending physicians, 2 fellows, and 3 residents; 58% with < 10 years' and 23% with > 20 years' anesthesia practice. Most participants (92%) practised in an academic setting, caring for a median [interquartile range] 400 [200-500] children annually. Most (96%) indicated their BCCH experience had changed their practice, with a greater effect on using intravenous anesthesia for maintenance than induction. Changes were influenced by a positive experience (77%), supportive environment (42%), and scientific evidence (42%). Choice of anesthetic technique depended on patient factors (89%), institutional expectations (46%), pharmacology (42%), and patient preference (39%), but not parental preference (15%). Interviews with 11 participants focused on intervention bundles to enable success, expectation-setting, family education, equipment and staff availability, and supportive workflows.
conclusionTraining in a TIVA institution can have a profound effect on using TIVA in children and drive changes in anesthetic practice elsewhere. Introducing TIVA requires a supportive culture, appropriate equipment, and the personalization of approaches, and may benefit from understanding factors in change management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.