ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
A Scalable and Cost-Effective In-Line Barcoding Strategy for Standardized 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing: Performance Evaluation and Bias Assessment.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-line barcoding offers a streamlined and scalable alternative to two-step PCR library preparation for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, enabling cost-effective, high-throughput profiling of microbial communities. Here, we tested 136 and 156 in-line barcoded primer pairs for bacterial and archaeal communities for their performance across environmental samples and a mock standard community. The primers were designed by combining widely used universal 16S rRNA gene primers with existing barcode sets from Illumina kits. The designed primer pairs produced efficient and consistent amplification with minimal dropout and no systematic taxonomic bias. Through clustering and performance-based filtering, we selected final sets of 96 pairs for both bacterial and archaeal communities that work efficiently and well together for direct further use. This in-line tagging strategy is easy to adopt with fewer processing steps and PCR-associated artefacts, allows straightforward sample tracking, and supports reliable large-scale microbiome studies. We also present a framework for evaluating barcode- or primer-induced biases. More broadly, the proposed in-line barcoding strategy can be adapted to any amplicon-sequencing application, as well as targeted sequencing, highlighting its relevance beyond 16S rRNA gene surveys. All validation datasets, open-source processing scripts, and barcode design resources are provided to promote reproducibility and community-wide adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.