ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Tear Film Imager Findings Support a New Perspective on the Mechanisms of Tear Film Thinning in Healthy Subjects.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Tear film thinning primarily occurs by two mechanisms: evaporation and tangential redistribution. The Tear Film Imager (TFI; AdOM, Israel) was used in healthy subjects to simultaneously measure multiple tear film parameters through normal blink cycles to bring a new perspective on the relative contributions of these mechanisms to tear film thinning. Methods: Tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), muco-aqueous layer thickness (MALT), and inter-blink muco-aqueous layer thinning rate (MALTR) were measured with the TFI in 20 healthy subjects. Tear film evaporation rates were obtained from a PubMed literature review. Results: Tear film geometric mean (geometric standard deviation) measurements in healthy subjects were 52.7 (1.55) nm for LLT (n = 20), 3282 (1.3) nm for MALT (n = 20), and -63 (2.0) nm/s for MALTR (n = 17). Literature-based mean tear film evaporation rates in healthy subjects, measured using either closed chamber evaporimeters or ventilated chambers allowing air flow across the ocular surface, ranged from 4.07 to 39.3 nm/s (weighted mean = 11.3 nm/s). Conclusions: In healthy subjects, the inter-blink MALTR measured by the TFI is too rapid to be accounted for by reported rates of tear film evaporation. The MALTR in the early period after blinking appears to result mainly from tangential flow and redistribution of the muco-aqueous layer, predominantly driven by the Marangoni effect, with gravity and other forces playing a comparatively minor role. Increased understanding of the mechanisms of tear film thinning and break-up time in healthy subjects may potentially help guide the development of novel therapeutic options for dry eye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.