Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112672›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Regime shift detection and neurocomputational substrates for under and overreactions to change.

Mu-Chen Wang, George Wu, Shih-Wei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mu-Chen WangInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9451-2193
George WuBooth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Shih-Wei WuInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2728-9620

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 108-2410-H-010-012-MY3National Science and Technology Council 110-2410-H-A49A-504 -MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world constantly changes, with the underlying state of the world shifting from one regime to another. The ability to detect a regime shift, such as the onset of a pandemic or the end of a recession, significantly impacts individual decisions, as well as governmental policies. However, determining whether a regime has changed is usually not obvious, as signals are noisy and reflective of the volatility of the environment. We designed an fMRI paradigm that examines a stylized regime-shift detection task. Human participants showed systematic overreaction and underreaction: Overreaction was most commonly seen when signals were noisy, but when environments were stable and change is possible but unlikely. By contrast, underreaction was observed when signals were precise but when environments were unstable and hence change was more likely. These behavioral signatures are consistent with the

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultBayesian modelingchange detectiondecision makingfMRIhumanneuroscienceoverreactions to changeregime shiftsystem neglectunderreactions to change

Identifiers

PMID42112672
PMCPMC13160555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.