Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Case Report: Patient-specific 3D-printed preoperative simulation for tailored resection and reconstruction in complex vertebral tumors: a case of giant recurrent chondrosarcoma at the cervicothoracic junction.

M De Robertis, P P Cotrufo, N Khaled Mansour, P Oliva, C Cappelli, E Stucchi, A Baram, G Capo, U Cariboni, G Mercante and 3 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M De RobertisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
P P CotrufoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
N Khaled MansourIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
P OlivaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
C CappelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
E StucchiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
A BaramDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
G CapoDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
U CariboniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
G MercanteDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
M FornariDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
F PessinaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
C BrembillaDepartment of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a rapidly evolving technology that is transforming various fields and its application in surgery, particularly in spinal procedures, has seen substantial growth in the last 10 years. It enables the production of highly accurate, patient-specific custom implants and anatomical models, enhancing preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative decision-making. This article describes the workflow adopted to produce a 3D-printed model of the cervical column of a patient affected by a recurrent giant cervical chondrosarcoma, focusing on its application in the presurgical resection and reconstruction planning. Methods and results: We present the case of a 67-year-old female patient with recurrent clear cell chondrosarcoma of the cervical spine. After multidisciplinary discussion, a two-stage (posterior and anterior stage) intentional Enneking inappropriate subtotal resection, followed by adjuvant proton beam therapy (PBT), was planned. One week before the second surgical stage, a surgical simulation was performed on a 3D-printed model. For the 3D virtual modeling, contrast-enhanced CT images of the cervicothoracic spine were obtained for the segmentation of the different anatomical structures. A PolyJet J850 Digital Anatomy® (Stratasys, USA) printer was used due to its ability to assign different materials to each structure, closely mimicking real tissue properties. Surgery was completed without complications, with neurological improvement from American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) C to D. Adequate decompression and stable reconstruction were achieved. Adjuvant PBT was delivered postoperatively. At the 6-month follow-up, imaging demonstrated good local control and early fusion, and the patient was pain-free and functionally independent. Discussion and conclusion: The creation of patient-specific, 1:1 scale 3D-printed anatomical models is a crucial tool in the improvement of preoperative planning, providing crucial tactile and visual insights for complex spinal tumor resection and reconstruction, thereby improving surgical precision and safety.

Indexed as

3D-printed modelanterior column reconstructionpersonalized medicinepreoperative planningvertebral tumors

Identifiers

PMID42112487
PMCPMC13153075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.