Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112409›Full record

ArticleObservational studies2026

Matching with Multiple Criteria and Its Application to Health Disparities Research.

Chang Chen, Zhiyu Qian, Bo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Observational studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chang ChenBiostatistics University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Zhiyu QianDivision of Urological Surgery Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Bo ZhangVaccine and Infectious Disease Fred Hutch Cancer Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-1124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matching is a popular nonparametric covariate adjustment strategy in empirical health services research. Matching helps construct two groups comparable in many baseline covariates but different in some key aspects under investigation. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) defines a health services disparity as the difference in accessing health services between members of racial or ethnic minorities not justified by the difference in health status or patients' preference. To estimate a disparity measure consistent with the IOM definition, we propose a statistical matching methodology that constructs matched comparison groups from, for instance, white men, that resemble the target group, for instance, black men, in some selected covariates while remaining identical to the white men population before matching in the remaining covariates. Using the proposed method, we investigated the disparity gaps between white men and black men in the US in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening based on the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BFRSS) database. We found a widening PSA screening rate as the white matched comparison group increasingly resembles the black men group. Finally, we provide code that replicates the case study and a tutorial that enables users to design customized matched comparison groups satisfying multiple criteria.

Indexed as

Health disparitiesR packageStatistical matchingTapered matching

Identifiers

PMID42112409
PMCPMC13155351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.