Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112408›Full record

ArticleObservational studies2026

Causal Mediation Analysis for Effect Heterogeneity.

Jiaqing Zhang, Linda Valeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Observational studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiaqing ZhangAdobe Inc.
Linda ValeriBiostatistics Columbia University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impact of an exposure on an outcome through a mediator is crucial in many fields of study. However, the effect often varies across subgroups. Addressing why and how an exposure gives rise to an outcome differently for subsets provides a deeper understanding about what works for whom through which intermediate(s). This paper explores causal mechanisms by focusing on explaining effect heterogeneity via causal mediation analysis. The counterfactual framework is extended to heterogeneous effect decomposition. We provide nonparametric definitions, identification assumptions, and analytical formulas for various direct and indirect effect heterogeneity measures. The decomposition of effect heterogeneity provides insightful causal implications about the question for whom and in what context that the effect operates. The proposed methodology is demonstrated through an application of effect heterogeneity decomposition of neighborhood poverty on mental health, modified by gender, using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health).

Indexed as

causal heterogeneitycausal inferencecausal mediationcausal modification

Identifiers

PMID42112408
PMCPMC13155353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.