ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2026
Does Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Affect the Oncological Outcome: A Retrospective Study.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality Of Life and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Metastatic Bone Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib's Effectiveness and Safety in the Treatment of Bone Sarcoma.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Soft tissue sarcoma is commonly misdiagnosed as a benign tumor and excised without appropriate precautions mandatory to deal with malignancy. Referrals after inadequate initial excision account for 19-35% of new patients in sarcoma centers. The objective of this study was to assess the oncological outcome of inappropriately treated soft tissue sarcomas in a retrospective, single-center analysis. Methods: This study included 43 patients who had soft tissue sarcomas in the extremities and were inadequately treated. They were referred to Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt and managed from November 1999 to April 2017. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year after adequate resection. The oncological outcome was assessed regarding the incidence of local recurrence, chest metastasis as well as the overall survivorship. Results: This study included 23 males and 20 females. 19 patients developed local recurrence (44.2%). 17 patients developed chest metastasis (39.5%). The incidence of local recurrence and chest metastasis was significantly affected by the type of the margin. Regarding the overall survival, 14 patients (32.6%) died during the follow up, while 29 patients (67.4%) were still alive by the end of the study. Conclusion: In our study, oncological outcome was significantly affected only by the margin status. Chest metastasis affected overall survival dramatically. Although it is challenging to achieve resection with wide margin, it is mandatory to get good oncological outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.