Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112262›Full record

ArticleJournal of exercise rehabilitation2026

Differential hemodynamic adaptations to identical body conditioning program across blood pressure categories: a quasi-experimental study.

Sang-Geun Jo, Yong-Seok Jee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang-Geun JoResearch Institute of Sports and Industry Science, Hanseo University, Seosan, Korea.
Yong-Seok JeeResearch Institute of Sports and Industry Science, Hanseo University, Seosan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-0843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined whether identical body conditioning program would differentially affect hemodynamic, body composition, and physical fitness parameters across blood pressure (BP) categories, and explored the potential role of autonomic modulation in mediating exercise-induced adaptations. In this quasi-experimental study, 85 participants completed a structured 15-week exercise program. All participants were categorized into four groups as follows: normal BP (n=21), elevated BP (n=20), stage 1 hypertension (n=22), and stage 2 hypertension (n=22). Because muscle mass and basal metabolic rate (BMR) differed among the groups at baseline, a repeated-measures analysis of covariance was conducted using these variables as covariates to assess the effects of time and group. Significant interactions were observed for systolic BP with pronounced reductions in the stage 1 hypertension and stage 2 hypertension groups, particularly in stage 2 hypertension. Diastolic BP and heart rate also demonstrated significant differential responses across groups. Cardiorespiratory fitness showed group-dependent responses, with significant group and time × group effects observed for maximal oxygen uptake. In contrast, no significant interactions were found for body weight, fat mass, body circumferences and grip strength. Importantly, the hemodynamic improvements occurred independently of changes in body composition and were robust after adjustment for baseline muscle mass and BMR. These findings are consistent with the possibility that exercise-induced autonomic modulation may contribute to early BP improvements; however, direct autonomic indices were not measured.

Indexed as

Body conditioning programHemodynamicsHypertensionPhysical fitnessYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42112262
PMCPMC13153782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.