ArticleJournal of medicine and life2026
A study on patient perceived value in cardiology private health care services: a marketing perspective.
Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving service interaction and patient satisfaction requires understanding how they perceive the value of health care services. Using Weinstein's adapted Perceived Value framework, this study investigated how patients' socio-demographic factors affect their perceived value of cardiology private health care services. The perceived value variable was computed as the difference between the sum of perceived service quality, perceived service outcome, and organizational image, and the non-monetary costs. The sample comprised 210 cardiology patients, and data were collected via a self-administered questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests were used to identify socio-demographic differences, and Spearman correlations were used to assess associations. Findings revealed that social responsibility and non-monetary costs were evaluated lower than empathy, perceived service quality, and safety. Gender and education level showed statistically significant differences in the variables: performance, empathy, and non-monetary costs, respectively. The study also provides useful marketing strategies for enhancing patient-perceived value based on their socio-demographic characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.