Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112216›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life2026

Acceptability and feasibility of the Zulfiqar Frailty Scale (ZFS) in primary care: a cross-sectional survey.

Abrar-Ahmad Zulfiqar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abrar-Ahmad ZulfiqarInternal Medicine Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty in older adults is a major public health concern in primary care. Although numerous frailty screening tools have been developed, their implementation in routine outpatient practice remains limited, mainly due to time constraints and perceived complexity. The Zulfiqar Frailty Scale (ZFS) was specifically designed for use in primary care. Beyond its psychometric properties, its acceptability and feasibility among healthcare professionals require evaluation. We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive survey using an anonymous questionnaire distributed to general practitioners and advanced practice nurses working in outpatient settings. Participants were asked to use the ZFS during routine renewal consultations in patients aged 65 years and older and to compare it with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Perceived feasibility, relevance, ease of use, reproducibility, and time required for completion were assessed. Fourteen practitioners provided usable responses, evaluating 126 older patients. The majority of participants reported that the ZFS could be completed in less than 5 minutes and considered it easy to use and reproducible. Most practitioners perceived the ZFS as relevant for routine clinical practice and feasible based on information available in medical records. A large proportion of respondents indicated their intention to integrate the ZFS into daily practice. Overall perceptions of feasibility and ease of use were comparable between the ZFS and the CFS. This study suggests that the Zulfiqar Frailty Scale is a feasible and well-accepted tool for frailty screening in primary care settings. Its simplicity and short administration time may facilitate the integration of frailty screening into routine outpatient practice. Larger studies are warranted to further assess its implementation and impact across diverse primary care contexts.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesfeasibilityfrailtyprimary carescreeningZulfiqar Frailty Scale

Identifiers

PMID42112216
PMCPMC13155165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.