Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112210›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2012

Guidance on the safety assessment of

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  6. Genetic diversity and distinction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Proteomic Characterization of Bacteriocin-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Effects ofVeterinarni medicina · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Probiotic potential and safety assessment of bacteriocinogenicCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Selection of lactic acid bacteria with promising probiotic aptitudes from fruit and ability to survive in different food matrices.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  15. Ex-Vivo Adhesion ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  16. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Guidance document is intended to provide a method to identify

Indexed as

ampicillinEnterococcus faeciumespguidancehylEfmIS16safety

Identifiers

PMID42112210
PMCPMC13151628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.