Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112184›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2012

Scientific Opinion on the safety of stigmasterol-rich plant sterols as food additive.

EFSA Panel on Food additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Therapeutic potential of phytochemical compounds in cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA Panel on Food additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) delivers a scientific opinion evaluating the safety of use of stigmasterol-rich plant sterols in ready-to-freeze alcoholic cocktails as a stabiliser. Biological and toxicological data on stigmasterol-rich plant sterols were not provided, but the available data on phytosterols and their esters can be used to evaluate the safety of stigmasterol-rich plant sterols provided that the studies are performed with phytosterol preparations containing also a well-defined percentage of stigmasterol. Less than 5% of dietary phytosterols, phytostanols, and their esters are absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract of rats and human. The metabolic fate of phytosterols and their esters is similar between rats and humans. No evidence of mutagenicity or genotoxicity of phytosterols or phytosterol esters was observed. The Panel concluded that stigmasterol-rich plant sterols are not of concern with respect to genotoxicity. Toxicity studies on phytosterols and phytosterol esters were limited to 90-day subchronic toxicity studies and a 2-generation reproductive toxicity study in rats. No chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity or developmental toxicity studies conducted with phytosterols, phytostanols, and their esters were identified. For adults, mean and 95

Indexed as

brassicasterolcampesterolCAS Registry Number 83‐48‐7food additivephytosterolsstigmasterolStigmasterol‐rich plant sterolsβ‐sitosterol

Identifiers

PMID42112184
PMCPMC13151835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.