ArticleCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2026
A hybrid in-person and online group singing program for older adults with breathing limitations: A pilot mixed-methods study.
Article in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Group singing (GS) programs have emerged as a promising option to address both the respiratory and psychological needs of patients with breathing limitations. No study has documented a hybrid delivery mode that simultaneously combines in-person and online modalities. This study aims to explore participants' experiences and the effects on respiratory control, quality of life, and social inclusion of a hybrid GS program that includes in-person and online groups. Methods: Using a mixed-method convergent design, we recruited twenty individuals with breathing limitations. The GS program was delivered weekly over 12 weeks, with sessions lasting two hours. Participants joined either in person ( Results: Participants primarily attended either in person or online. Both groups reported a sense of connection with the other participants but expressed concerns about using the technology. Online participants valued the opportunity to engage despite mobility or health limitations, though technological challenges affected feedback and group cohesion. Quantitative and qualitative findings revealed perceived improvements in pulmonary health and social inclusion, despite mixed outcomes regarding overall quality of life. Conclusion: Hybrid GS programs are well-received and beneficial for individuals with breathing limitations. They offer a promising complement to traditional pulmonary rehabilitation by enhancing accessibility and supporting long-term engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.