Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112087›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Doctor performance drivers: insights from various theoretical perspectives.

Suci Utami Apsari, Devie, Josua Tarigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suci Utami ApsariSchool of Business and Management, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
DevieSchool of Business and Management, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Josua TariganSchool of Business and Management, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing need to improve patient outcomes alongside rising healthcare costs makes digital transformation in healthcare essential. However, technology implementation effectiveness depends strongly on acceptance by healthcare professionals. This study examines how self-efficacy, perceived job insecurity, and intention to use technology contribute to physician performance and innovation process outcomes. Methods: Drawing from Innovation Diffusion Theory, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and self-efficacy theory, a comprehensive multi-theoretical model was developed. Data were collected through a structured survey involving healthcare professionals and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results: Self-efficacy significantly encourages technology adoption, which in turn enhances both innovation and physician performance. Contrary to assumptions, perceived job insecurity does not significantly influence the intention to adopt technology but has a direct negative impact on physician performance. Discussion: This research contributes to the existing literature by offering an integrated multi-theoretical framework combining TAM, Innovation Diffusion Theory, self-efficacy, and job insecurity. Unlike earlier studies, it examines both direct and indirect effects and finds that job insecurity may not be a critical obstacle to technology use. The study also includes insights from primary care physicians, a group often underrepresented in digital health research.

Indexed as

healthcare innovationperceived job insecurityphysician performanceself-efficacytechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID42112087
PMCPMC13151570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.