ArticleJournal of health equity2026
Insights from older adults in North Carolina: Understanding social determinants of health through focus groups.
Article in Journal of health equity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Older adults experience unique social determinants of health (SDoH) that profoundly impact their health outcomes, but these factors are often overlooked in their healthcare. SDoH are the socioeconomic conditions in which people live, which drive over 60% of health outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to understand older adults' perspectives on the most significant SDoH in their lives, as well as what their healthcare providers may be overlooking. We conducted focus groups with individuals aged 55 and older across three North Carolina counties (Caswell, Chatham, and Orange Counties) to assess how different community contexts influence SDoH. Financial stability and paying for healthcare were discussed similarly in all counties, as were provider overburdening, healthcare center inefficiency, and insurance company influence in limiting healthcare access. Caswell and Chatham participants discussed education access to navigate healthcare systems, whereas Orange and Caswell counties discussed transportation and housing concerns. Additionally, Orange and Chatham participants described senior socialization for health. All groups felt that time and good relationships with providers were essential for positive outcomes and facilitating SDoH discussion. These insights from the voices of older adults shed light on both common and diverse needs of these individuals across various communities and can guide healthcare and policy initiatives to improve health outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.