ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Development and External Validation of a Prognostic Prediction Model for Hospitalization in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Ambulatory Patients.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Accurately predicting hospitalization risk in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive outpatients is critical for triage and resource planning. We developed and externally validated a clinical prediction model for 30-day COVID-19 hospitalization using data from symptomatic adults who tested positive in the outpatient setting. The derivation cohort included 22 859 patients from 185 outpatient clinics in a large Utah health care network between December 2021 and March 2023, during Omicron variant predominance. Among these patients, 281 (1.2%) were hospitalized for COVID-19 within 30 days. Methods: We fit random forest and multivariable logistic regression models incorporating clinical variables (vital signs, comorbidities, and vaccination status), social determinants of health, seasonality, and air quality indices. We externally validated our model using data from 10 670 patients in a Pennsylvania healthcare network who tested positive between October 2021 and November 2022, among whom 166 (1.6%) were hospitalized. Results: In cross-validation, a random forest model including only clinical predictors performed similarly to an expanded model that also included social, environmental, and seasonal predictors (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.88 for both). A parsimonious logistic regression model with only 3 clinical predictors (respiratory rate, age, and pulse oximetry) achieved an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI: .72-.86) on internal validation and an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: .85-.90) on external validation. Calibration was robust, and decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical utility at low-risk thresholds. Conclusions: We conclude that a parsimonious 3-predictor model can effectively stratify hospitalization risk in SARS-CoV-2 positive outpatients, offering a practical tool to support clinical decision-making and optimize resource allocation during current and future COVID-19 surges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.