ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2026
Association of Internet use disorder and the use of traditional watches.
Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the association between the use of so-called "timekeepers", such as traditional wristwatches or classic alarm clocks, or digital "timekeepers" as smartphones or smartwatches, and Internet use disorder. Based on theoretical models it was examined whether certain everyday habits are related to the extent of problematic online behavior. In a cross-sectional online survey (N = 6,615), participants answered the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) and questions about their usage behavior in the context of smartphones, wrist watches, and alarm clocks. Participants who stated that their Internet use was excessive or that they stayed online longer than planned after looking at the clock function on their smartphone had significantly higher CIUS scores. The same was true for people who did not wear a watch, used their smartphone as an alarm clock, took it into the bedroom, or went online immediately after waking up. The time of first smartphone use in the morning proved to be a significant predictor of problematic use, whereas the last time using the smartphone before going to bed was not. The findings replicate and extend previous studies and suggest that non-Internet-connected timekeepers are associated with less dysfunctional Internet and smartphone usage patterns. The use of the smartphone as a multifunctional device could be suggested as a potential trigger for unwanted media use. However, targeted everyday modifications - such as the use of classic watches - might contribute to the prevention of Internet use disorder which needs to be tested in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.