Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111902›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2025

Deep RL Needs Deep Behavior Analysis: Exploring Implicit Planning by Model-Free Agents in Open-Ended Environments.

Riley Simmons-Edler, Ryan P Badman, Felix Baastad Berg, Raymond Chua, John J Vastola, Joshua Lunger, William Qian, Kanaka Rajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Solvable models of learning to pursue a moving target.Reinforcement learning journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Riley Simmons-EdlerDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School.
Ryan P BadmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School.
Felix Baastad BergDepartment of Mathematics, NTNU.
Raymond ChuaSchool of Computer Science, McGill University & Mila.
John J VastolaDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School.
Joshua LungerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
William QianBiophysics Graduate Program, Harvard University.
Kanaka RajanDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School.

Funding

Understanding Sensorimotor Control Through Realistic Neuro-Biomechanical SimulationU01NS136507 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Bingni Wen Brunton, Bence P Olveczky · 2024 to 2026
$7.1M
Mechanisms of neural circuit dynamics in working memoryU01NS090541 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, BRODY, CARLOS D · 2014 to 2016
$3.1M
The role of patterned activity in neuronal codes for behaviorU01NS090576 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FELLIN, TOMMASO, HISTED, MARK H · 2014 to 2016
$1.6M
Neural Network Models Constrained by Multiscale Data to Infer Minimal Functional Motifs in the BrainRF1DA056403 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RAJAN, KANAKA · 2022 to 2022
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA056403NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090541NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090576NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS136507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the behavior of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents-particularly as task and agent sophistication increase-requires more than simple comparison of reward curves, yet standard methods for behavioral analysis remain underdeveloped in DRL. We apply tools from neuroscience and ethology to study DRL agents in a novel, complex, partially observable environment, ForageWorld, designed to capture key aspects of real-world animal foraging-including sparse, depleting resource patches, predator threats, and spatially extended arenas. We use this environment as a platform for applying joint behavioral and neural analysis to agents, revealing detailed, quantitatively grounded insights into agent strategies, memory, and planning. Contrary to common assumptions, we find that model-free RNN-based DRL agents can exhibit structured, planning-like behavior purely through emergent dynamics-without requiring explicit memory modules or world models. Our results show that studying DRL agents like animals-analyzing them with neuroethology-inspired tools that reveal structure in both behavior and neural dynamics-uncovers rich structure in their learning dynamics that would otherwise remain invisible. We distill these tools into a general analysis framework linking core behavioral and representational features to diagnostic methods, which can be reused for a wide range of tasks and agents. As agents grow more complex and autonomous, bridging neuroscience, cognitive science, and AI will be essential-not just for understanding their behavior, but for ensuring safe alignment and maximizing desirable behaviors that are hard to measure via reward. We show how this can be done by drawing on lessons from how biological intelligence is studied.

Identifiers

PMID42111902
PMCPMC13151939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.