ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2025
Measuring and Controlling Solution Degeneracy across Task-Trained Recurrent Neural Networks.
Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pretraining of Embodied Recurrent Networks Bridges the Gap Between Artificial and Cortical Neural Activities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structure, disorder, and dynamics in task-trained recurrent neural circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Emotional modulation of inhibitory control in rumination from empirical and computational perspectives.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dissecting Larval Zebrafish Hunting using Deep Reinforcement Learning Trained RNN Agents.Proceedings of the ... Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience · 2026Article
- InputDSA : Demixing then comparing recurrent and externally driven dynamics.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Task-Parametrized Dynamics: Representation of Time and Decisions in Recurrent Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Task-trained recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are widely used in neuroscience and machine learning to model dynamical computations. To gain mechanistic insight into how neural systems solve tasks, prior work often reverse-engineers individual trained networks. However, different RNNs trained on the same task and achieving similar performance can exhibit strikingly different internal solutions, a phenomenon known as solution degeneracy. Here, we develop a unified framework to systematically quantify and control solution degeneracy across three levels: behavior, neural dynamics, and weight space. We apply this framework to 3,400 RNNs trained on four neuroscience-relevant tasks-flip-flop memory, sine wave generation, delayed discrimination, and path integration-while systematically varying task complexity, learning regime, network size, and regularization. We find that higher task complexity and stronger feature learning reduce degeneracy in neural dynamics but increase it in weight space, with mixed effects on behavior. In contrast, larger networks and structural regularization reduce degeneracy at all three levels. These findings empirically validate the Contravariance Principle and provide practical guidance for researchers seeking to tune the variability of RNN solutions, either to uncover shared neural mechanisms or to model the individual variability observed in biological systems. This work provides a principled framework for quantifying and controlling solution degeneracy in task-trained RNNs, offering new tools for building more interpretable and biologically grounded models of neural computation.
Identifiers
42111901PMC13151944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.