ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Bleeding prevention with desmopressin for allograft kidney biopsies: a double-blind randomized study.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous kidney allograft biopsy is essential for evaluating graft dysfunction, but post-procedural bleeding remains the most frequent complication, particularly among recipients with impaired renal function. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used prophylactically to reduce bleeding risk, yet its efficacy in the transplant setting remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at a quaternary transplant center in Brazil. Adult kidney transplant recipients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m² undergoing allograft biopsy were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous desmopressin (0.3 μg/kg) or placebo before biopsy. All procedures were ultrasound-guided and performed by experienced nephrologists. The primary endpoint was any biopsy-related bleeding complication. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding (transfusion, embolization, nephrectomy, or death), minor bleeding (macroscopic hematuria, hematoma, hemoglobin drop >20%), and hyponatremia. Results: A total of 96 biopsies were randomized (48 per group). Baseline demographics, clinical, and procedural characteristics were well balanced. Any biopsy-related bleeding complication occurred in 29.1% of procedures overall, without a significant difference between the desmopressin and placebo groups (35.4% vs. 22.9%, Conclusions: In this trial of high-risk kidney transplant recipients, prophylactic desmopressin did not reduce biopsy-related bleeding complications compared with placebo. Routine pre-biopsy administration is not supported when biopsies are performed under optimal technical conditions and patient preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.