Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111898›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2026

Bleeding prevention with desmopressin for allograft kidney biopsies: a double-blind randomized study.

Gabriel Sartori Pacini, Arthur Gus Manfro, Renata Asnis Schuchmann, Vanderlei Carlos Bertuol Junior, Amanda Vilaverde Perez, Eduarda Taís Schneider, Leonardo Luigi Adams Backes, Gabriela Vieira Steckert, Roberto Ceratti Manfro, Andrea Carla Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriel Sartori PaciniDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-7082
Arthur Gus ManfroDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Renata Asnis SchuchmannDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Vanderlei Carlos Bertuol JuniorDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Amanda Vilaverde PerezPostgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, R. Ramiro Barcelos 2400, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eduarda Taís SchneiderDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Leonardo Luigi Adams BackesDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Gabriela Vieira SteckertDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Roberto Ceratti ManfroDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Andrea Carla BauerDivision of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous kidney allograft biopsy is essential for evaluating graft dysfunction, but post-procedural bleeding remains the most frequent complication, particularly among recipients with impaired renal function. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used prophylactically to reduce bleeding risk, yet its efficacy in the transplant setting remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at a quaternary transplant center in Brazil. Adult kidney transplant recipients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m² undergoing allograft biopsy were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous desmopressin (0.3 μg/kg) or placebo before biopsy. All procedures were ultrasound-guided and performed by experienced nephrologists. The primary endpoint was any biopsy-related bleeding complication. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding (transfusion, embolization, nephrectomy, or death), minor bleeding (macroscopic hematuria, hematoma, hemoglobin drop >20%), and hyponatremia. Results: A total of 96 biopsies were randomized (48 per group). Baseline demographics, clinical, and procedural characteristics were well balanced. Any biopsy-related bleeding complication occurred in 29.1% of procedures overall, without a significant difference between the desmopressin and placebo groups (35.4% vs. 22.9%, Conclusions: In this trial of high-risk kidney transplant recipients, prophylactic desmopressin did not reduce biopsy-related bleeding complications compared with placebo. Routine pre-biopsy administration is not supported when biopsies are performed under optimal technical conditions and patient preparation.

Indexed as

bleedingdesmopressinkidney biopsykidney transplantationrenal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42111898
PMCPMC13156933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.