Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111823›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Native flowering plants and their pollinators for use in urban landscape: the Turkmen Mountain case.

Hilal Topcu, Sibel Yigiter, Coskun Guclu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hilal TopcuThe Parks and Gardens Department of the Eskisehir Metropolitan Municipality, Eskisehir, Odunpazarı, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Sibel YigiterDepartment of Horticulture, Agriculture Faculty, Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Coskun GucluDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive field study examining the interaction between native flowering plant species suitable for urban landscapes and the pollinators that visit them. The research was conducted in June 2021 at 13 different locations in the Turkmen Mountain region within the borders of Eskisehir. A total of 57 flowering plant species were identified in the study; pollinator activity was observed in 35 of them. Additionally, the species diversity of pollinators and their interactions with plants were examined in detail, and for this purpose, the Pollinator Activity Index (PAI) was developed, combining the diversity of plant families, pollinator visits, and pollinator diversity. The findings revealed that the Fabaceae family had the highest PAI value (2.484 × 10

Indexed as

EcosystemMagnoliopsidaPollinationAnimalsBiodiversityCitiesFlowersClimateConvolvulaceaeDiversityFabaceaeNative plants

Identifiers

PMID42111823
PMCPMC13151929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.