ArticlePeerJ2026
Gait variability and local dynamic stability are exacerbated by age and visual cues.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gait variability increases and dynamic gait stability decreases with age, which may lead to an increased risk of falls. Additionally, the need to process visual cues can exacerbate changes in gait variability and dynamic gait stability in older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare gait variability and dynamic gait stability in young and older adults walking overground and on a treadmill with and without visual cues. We hypothesized that gait variability would increase and dynamic gait stability would decrease during the visually cued gait. We also hypothesized that older adults would have higher variability and lower stability than younger adults across all walking conditions. Methods: Participants walked for 3 minutes overground and on a treadmill, with and without visual cues, at their self-selected overground walking speed. The visual cues were projected onto the treadmill and matched the participant's self-selected speed, step length, and width. We quantified gait variability as the coefficient of variation for stride time and stride length, and dynamic gait stability with the short-term Lyapunov exponent. Results: Both groups had the highest stride time variability during the visual cue condition. Older adults demonstrated higher gait variability and lower dynamic gait stability than younger adults during the treadmill conditions with and without visual cues, but not during overground gait. Conclusions: Our study indicates that age increases gait variability and decreases dynamic gait stability, and this effect is exacerbated when walking becomes more challenging due to the presence of visual cues. The observed changes in gait variability and dynamic gait stability may be due to older adults requiring more cognitive capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.