ArticlePeerJ2026
Outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy in urological cancer: insights from a retrospective cohort.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy has been established as a treatment option for select patients with metastatic disease. However, its role in urological malignancies remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with urological cancers, with a focus on renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for suspected metastases from urological malignancies at a single institution between 2014 and 2023. A subgroup analysis of 11 patients with RCC was conducted. The cohort included 13 patients with kidney cancer, four with testicular tumors, and one with prostate cancer. Pulmonary lesions were confirmed to be metastatic in 14 patients and inflammatory changes in four. The median disease-free interval was 25 months and the median overall survival after pulmonary resection was 113 months. In the RCC subgroup, the 10-year survival rate exceeded 50%, despite a 66.7% recurrence rate. No significant prognostic factors were identified, although favorable trends were observed for younger age, solitary metastases, and absence of vascular invasion. In urological malignancies, particularly renal cell carcinoma, pulmonary metastasectomy was associated with prolonged survival in carefully selected patients. Surgical resection may serve both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes, supporting its role within a multidisciplinary treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.