Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111804›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

An innovative approach to preparing medical students for residency application season.

Elaine Situ-LaCasse, Daniel C Butler, Katie Kowalek, Timothy Marshall, Richard Amini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elaine Situ-LaCasseDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Daniel C ButlerDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Katie KowalekDepartment of Pediatrics (Critical Care), University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Timothy MarshallDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Boise, Idaho, United States.
Richard AminiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The residency application process has become increasingly complex, with constant updates to the Electronic Residency Application Service (MyERAS), the introduction of the Residency Common Application Service (RCAS), and changes to specialty-specific processes like the Urology and Plastic Surgery Matches. Even advisors struggle to provide consistent guidance, leaving students overwhelmed by program signaling, application customization, and other challenges. To address this, we developed and integrated into our curriculum a Residency Application Bootcamp, providing students with a standardized, structured approach to confidently navigate this high-stakes and ever-evolving process. Methods: We integrated a Residency Application Bootcamp into a 2-week Intersessions course at the end of core clerkships. The workshop began with a 2-h didactic covering essential application topics, followed by 1 day of interactive breakout sessions. Students rotated through interactive breakout sessions led by Student Affairs Deans, focusing on key application components such as personal statements, curriculum vitaes (CVs), noteworthy characteristics (NWCs), and an overview of residency application platforms. This structured format emphasized personalized guidance and iterative feedback to prepare students for residency applications. Results: Two hundred forty-two students participated in three iterations of the workshop. Groups of 21-22 students rotated through the interactive breakout sessions. Students felt it was "the best part of Intersessions," "super helpful," and made other positive comments. Averaging the 3 years' scores together, the breakout sessions scored 4.27 out of 5. In addition, Student Affairs Deans who led the session felt it was an effective way to gain more personal exposure to students, provide individualized advising, and plant the seeds for upcoming MSPE meetings. Student Affairs Deans also reported that NWCs showed notable improvement after this session compared to last year. Discussion: The Residency Application Bootcamp was successfully implemented at our institution. The flexible format of this workshop allows for improvement and incorporation of student feedback. Although developed within a single institution, the Bootcamp's structure is readily adaptable to other medical schools. Further innovation and research should be pursued to better support students during this critical phase of medical school.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyJob ApplicationStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansElectronic residency application serviceMedical student career advisingResidency application bootcampResidency application preparationResidencyCASSpecialty advisingStudent affairs

Identifiers

PMID42111804
PMCPMC13151925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.