ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2025
Beyond the genome: Public awareness of personalized medicine.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Personalized medicine (PM) is becoming increasingly feasible due to advancements in DNA sequencing technology. Our study aims to evaluate the general population's understanding and attitudes toward PM in Tabriz city. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire from various participants, including health centers, outpatient cases, and community populations. The research involved forming a panel of specialists, conducting a literature review, developing initial survey questions, seeking expert feedback, revising and refining questions, implementing a pilot study, and finalizing the survey instrument. Results: The mean (SD) age of 313 participants was 39.63 (14.41) years, with 36.7% being male. About 65% of participants were married, 55.3% were employed, and 79.6% residing in the urban areas. Most participants reported good physical (64.2%) and mental health (58.1%) status. Half of the participants evaluated the different dimensions of their lifestyle as moderate. The majority of respondents had not heard about PM (67.4%; 95% CI: 62.0%-72.4%), and most believed that PM is a promising healthcare approach (61%; 95% CI: 55.5%-66.2%), or can be an essential tool for preventing, diagnosing, and treating various diseases (60.1%; 95% CI: 54.6%-65.3%). Attitudes towards PM were influenced by education level. Economic status influenced knowledge about PM ( Conclusion: The study revealed that education and economic status significantly influence individuals' awareness and attitudes towards PM. Education and income levels should be considered while planning for educational programs about PM. Our findings can inform the development of effective strategies for promoting PM in healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.