ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Deficit irrigation and grafting effects on soil attributes, vegetative growth, yield components, and quality of 'Crimson Seedless' grapevines under a semiarid region.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the combined effects of grafting and deficit irrigation (DI) on soil attributes, vegetative growth, yield components, fruit quality, and water productivity of 'Crimson Seedless' grapevines under semiarid conditions. It was hypothesized that the DI could enhance crop water productivity and fruit quality, especially when integrated with grafting, without a significant reduction in fruit yield. DI included five irrigation treatments: full irrigation (control), 75% of full irrigation over the season (D1), 75% of full irrigation except during the berries enlargement stage (principal growth stage 7, or BBCH 71-79), received water equivalent to the control (D2), 50% of full irrigation (D3), and 50% of full irrigation except during the berries enlargement stage, received water equivalent to control (D4), with and/or without grafting. The grapevines under deficit irrigation produced the highest crop water productivity, fruit soluble solid content (SSC), and total anthocyanins without significant impacts on fruit yield, except for D4 (severe deficit). Deficit irrigation applications saved 25%, 13%, 50%, and 26% of the water used for D1, D2, D3, and D4, respectively, compared with the control, resulting in decreased power consumption during vineyard irrigation and, subsequently, reduced irrigation costs. Moreover, soil porosity and hydraulic conductivity remained unaffected. In addition, grafted grapevines produced lower vegetative growth parameters but improved most fruit quality parameters without significantly affecting fruit yield. The present study confirmed that deficit irrigation could effectively save water and improve fruit quality without affecting fruit yield for grapevines in arid and semiarid regions. Furthermore, grafting on specific rootstock should be used as a practical approach for managing water deficit conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.