Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111683›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Extracorporeal Photopheresis: From Animal Models to Clinical Practice.

Inês Morgado, Janaki Manoja Vinnakota, Robert Zeiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inês MorgadoDepartment of Medicine I, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Janaki Manoja VinnakotaDepartment of Medicine I, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Robert ZeiserDepartment of Medicine I, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6565-3393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy characterized by the exposure of leukocytes to 8-methoxypsoralen and UV light irradiation, followed by reinfusion of the treated cells into the patient. ECP is considered a safe and well-tolerated procedure that preserves the beneficial aspects of immunity, such as antitumor and antiviral activities, with a low rate of side effects. Currently, ECP is used for the treatment of immune-mediated conditions, such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft-versus-host disease, solid organ transplant rejection, and autoimmune disorders. ECP is an immunomodulatory therapy characterized by multiple complex events that lead to the modulation of the immune response. Modifying the activity of myeloid antigen-presenting cells with apoptotic cell remnants is key to the therapeutic action of ECP; however, because the pathological roles of macrophages and dendritic cells are context specific, the precise effects of ECP vary between different diseases. Consequently, we need a much better understanding of the immunology and pharmacology of ECP to extend its use in solid organ transplantation and beyond. During the past decades, important advances were made using animal models of ECP, leading to a better mechanistic understanding and its more rational use in many T cell-mediated conditions. This review summarizes the available information on animal models of ECP, providing insights into the mechanisms of action, therapeutic applications, limitations, and translational potential from preclinical animal models to human clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID42111683
PMCPMC13155520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.