Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111654›Full record

ArticleGlomerular diseases

Clinical Outcome Assessment Endpoints in Nephrotic Syndrome Drug Development: Research Partner Feedback on Patient-Centered Trial Design.

John Devin Peipert, Maja Kuharic, Noelle E Carlozzi, Courtney N Hurt, Ashley E Rahimi, Jin-Shei Lai, Trivellore Raghunathan, Somayeh Hashemi, Howard Trachtman, Louise Oni and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glomerular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John Devin PeipertCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Maja KuharicDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Noelle E CarlozziDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and The Center for Health, Policy and Innovation (IHPI), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Courtney N HurtDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ashley E RahimiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jin-Shei LaiDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Trivellore RaghunathanSchool of Public Health, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Somayeh HashemiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Howard TrachtmanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Louise OniDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Rebecca ScherrDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yan ZhaiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Eloise SalmonDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) clinical trials often rely on biomarkers or clinical measures as primary endpoints, but these may not fully capture the treatment benefits that matter most to patients. Edema-related swelling, a central manifestation of NS, profoundly affects patients' health-related quality of life, including physical function, severe physical and mental symptoms, and ability to participate in routine activities, highlighting the need for clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that directly measure its severity and impact. The PREPARing a clinical outcomes assessment set for Nephrotic Syndrome (Prepare-NS) project, supported by the United States Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Pilot Grant Program, aims to address this unmet need. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with and surveyed clinical trialists from industry, academia, and patient advocacy organizations. Each queried participants on how COAs, including patient- and observer-reported outcomes, could be used to demonstrate treatment benefit in trials. Participants were asked about preferences for timing, frequency, and format of COA assessment, as well as how COA-based endpoints could best capture swelling impacts, and how these might relate to other trial endpoints. Results: Participants expressed strong support for COA-based endpoints to complement clinical or biomarker endpoints, noting that the impact of disease as represented by proteinuria does not fully capture potential treatment benefit to patients. We identified multiple endpoints to operationalize swelling COAs in clinical trials. Additional key considerations included optimal timing of assessments, feasibility of daily diaries (i.e., daily symptom ratings), potential confounding factors, and alignment of COAs with proteinuria or other endpoints. Conclusions: Collectively, these insights inform the Prepare-NS initiative's ongoing development and validation efforts. Incorporating standardized COAs in NS clinical trials could expand efficacy endpoints and pave the way for patient-centered NS drug development.

Indexed as

Drug developmentNephrotic syndromePatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42111654
PMCPMC13152270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.