Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111651›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Diagnostic yield and histopathological assessment of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy: a prospective comparison of two tunnelling approaches.

Gani Oruqaj, Sylvia Lohfink-Schumm, Stefan Gattenloehner, Learta Pervizaj-Oruqaj, Kevin Lo, Gabriele Krombach, Werner Seeger, Friedrich Grimminger, Khodr Tello, Matthias Hecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gani OruqajDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic II, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5053-088X
Sylvia Lohfink-SchummDepartment of Pathology, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Stefan GattenloehnerDepartment of Pathology, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Learta Pervizaj-OruqajDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, University Hospital Giessen, Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-1656
Kevin LoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic II, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Gabriele KrombachDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Giessen, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-3289
Werner SeegerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic II, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1946-0894
Friedrich GrimmingerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic II, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-6276
Khodr TelloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic II, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-623X
Matthias HeckerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic II, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Justus Liebig University, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used for mediastinal and hilar lymph node evaluation, although its diagnostic performance may be limited in rare tumours, benign diseases, lymphoproliferative disorders and for detailed molecular analyses. Data on the role of EBUS-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) remain limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 90 patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC for mediastinal or peribronchial lesions ≥1 cm. Two tunnelling approaches using 22-G (SonoTip TopGain) and 19-G (ViziShot 2 FLEX) TBNA needles were employed. TBNA and cryobiopsy with a 1.1-mm cryoprobe were performed sequentially in the same lymph node. Results: 45 patients were assigned to each group. The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC was 91.1% (22-G) and 93.3% (19-G) (p=0.0005 and p=0.006, respectively, Conclusions: EBUS-TMC is a safe, feasible and minimally invasive method with superior diagnostic yield and histological quality compared to EBUS-TBNA. Both 22-G and 19-G approaches are effective; 22-G is more adaptable for distal targets, while 19-G is suited for centrally located or accessible lesions. Combining EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TMC may further enhance diagnostic accuracy in complex cases.

Identifiers

PMID42111651
PMCPMC13148967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.