ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Estrogenic activity in tampon products.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tampons are widely used menstrual products with prolonged mucosal contact, raising questions about their potential role in exposing females to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). This study evaluated estrogenic activity in tampon extracts using a cell-based estrogen receptor reporter bioassay. Synthetic and organic tampons sourced from domestic and international markets were tested for estrogenic bioactivity. Of the 18 brands analyzed, estrogenic activity was detected in nearly half, independent of material type. Comparative chemical analysis of one estrogenic-active brand vs one nonactive brand via high-resolution mass spectrometry tentatively identified various plasticizers, surfactants, and fragrance agents, that were present in higher concentrations in the estrogenic-active brand. The list of chemicals included known EDCs, such as phthalates and alkylphenols, that may be responsible for the observed estrogenic activity. Notably, estrogenic activity varied by brand, suggesting formulation-dependent risk. Although the detected in vitro activity levels were low, the findings demonstrate that compounds capable of activating estrogen receptors can leach from tampons. These results highlight the importance of including endocrine bioactivity assays in tampon safety assessments and suggest that safer formulations are achievable. Further investigation is warranted to assess long-term health implications of low-level EDC exposure from menstrual products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.