ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Determinants of patient cycle time in primary healthcare: a large-scale retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient cycle time is a useful operational metric for assessing the clinical encounter pathway in primary healthcare settings. Prolonged cycle times may reflect delays within the consultation process and may affect patient experience and clinic flow. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate patient cycle time at a large Family and Community Medical Centre in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and to identify the demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with variations in cycle time. Methods: A retrospective analytical chart review was conducted using electronic health record data for all visits to FCMC over a 1-year period in 2025 ( Results: The median cycle time was 20 min (interquartile range: 20-21). Longer cycle times were significantly associated with visits to urgent care and chronic disease clinics, Saudi nationality, autumn visits, and acute diagnoses, including upper respiratory, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurological, and dermatological conditions. Shorter cycle times were observed for preventive care and diabetes-related visits. Increasing age was independently associated with shorter cycle time, while sex was not a significant predictor. Conclusion: Cycle time at this primary healthcare centre was relatively short compared with national and international benchmarks. However, it varied by clinic type, diagnosis, season, and patient characteristics. Targeted operational interventions focusing on urgent care services, seasonal demand, and acute presentations may help optimize the clinical consultation pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.