ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Impact of the transition to HPV-based primary screening in Portugal's organized cervical cancer screening program: A controlled interrupted time-series analysis (2014-2023).
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of transitioning from cytology to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on cervical cancer screening (CCS) performance in Portugal's Central Region. Study design: Retrospective, population-based evaluation using a controlled interrupted time-series (CITS) approach. Methods: CCS registry data (2014-2023) were analyzed in six-month intervals. Three performance indicators (participation, test positivity, and priority referrals) were modeled using negative binomial regression with appropriate offsets. A COVID-19 covariable (national lockdown, March-June 2020) adjusted for the temporary suspension of screening services. The organized breast cancer screening (BCS) program served as an external control to distinguish CCS-specific effects from system-wide temporal fluctuations. Results: The analysis included 594,074 CCS and 888,184 BCS screening episodes. Following HPV implementation, CCS evolved differently from the control group across all outcomes. Priority referrals showed the strongest effect, with a four-fold immediate increase in CCS not observed in BCS (IRR: 4.31; 95% CI: 3.89-4.79). Participation and test positivity also diverged between programs, although with smaller magnitude changes. Post-intervention trends differed across all outcomes, although the COVID-19 pandemic, occurring shortly after implementation, complicates the interpretation of temporal patterns. Conclusions: Transition to HPV-based screening was associated with changes in screening processes, including increased identification of high-risk cases requiring priority referral while maintaining participation. By incorporating an external control, the CITS approach strengthens attribution of observed effects to HPV implementation rather than background system dynamics. These findings support HPV-based screening within organized programs and highlight its role in improving risk stratification and program performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.