ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Agency as a catalyst in pulmonary rehabilitation implementation: Physiotherapists' perspectives.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a major global health burden, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a well-established, evidence-based intervention that improves functional capacity and quality of life for persons affected. Despite this, access to PR is limited globally and within South Africa. Insight into how PR programmes (PRP) are established and sustained in practice may help explain the persistence of this implementation gap. Aim: To explore physiotherapists' experiences of establishing outpatient PRP in the Cape Metropole. Setting: The study included public and private physiotherapists in the Cape Metropole, Western Cape Province, South Africa. Methods: An exploratory qualitative descriptive design was employed using semi-structured interviews with six physiotherapists who had attempted to establish outpatient PRP. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with Social Cognitive Theory informing interpretation of interactions between environmental conditions, clinician agency and programme outcomes. Results: Three interrelated themes were identified. Firstly, practice contexts, including funding structures, referral systems, organisational support and physical resources, shaped the feasibility of PRP. Secondly, clinician agency, expressed through motivation, self-efficacy, advocacy and adaptive capacity, influenced how physiotherapists navigated these contextual conditions. Thirdly, PRP followed divergent trajectories over time, with outcomes more predominantly shaped by how individual physiotherapists interpreted early experiences and feedback rather than by context alone. Conclusion: PRP implementation was shaped by dynamic interactions between contextual conditions and clinician agency. Participants faced similar challenges, however differences in their agency influenced whether PRP were sustained, adapted or remained partial. Strengthening physiotherapists' self-efficacy, behavioural capability and access to mentorship may support more sustainable PR provision in contexts where services remain limited. Contribution: This study highlights clinician agency as a critical mechanism in PR implementation and suggests that interventions to expand PR services should address both structural barriers and the development of physiotherapists' adaptive capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.