Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

When our measurements are different every day: an ML-SEM simulation study on within-person nonuniform measurement bias in intensive longitudinal data.

Georg Krammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Georg KrammerInstitute of Business and Vocational Education, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This simulation study evaluated how model fit in multilevel structural equation models (ML-SEM) is affected by within-person nonuniform measurement bias in intensive longitudinal data (ILD). This kind of bias would be given if item discrimination (i.e., their factor loadings) in multiple-item questionnaires varied within person across time. Prior simulation studies and ILD studies tend to assume no such within-person bias, while such a bias implies that relations within measurement points are not comparable across time. Methods: We simulating ILD under 450 conditions with various sample sizes, retesting frequencies, ICCs, and introduced within-person nonuniform measurement bias. We then investigated model (mis)fit in ML-SEM. Results: Type I error was well below nominal level. The χ Discussion: While ecological momentary assessment motivated our study, our findings are applicable to other research settings that yield data with the same generally hierarchical structure (e.g., ambulatory assessment, daily diary studies, experience sampling methods). We conclude with practical recommendations on samples sizes and re-testing frequencies to offer guidelines for evaluating ML-SEM in ILD.

Indexed as

ecological momentary assessmentintensive longitudinal datamultilevel structural equation modelssimulationwithin-person nonuniform measurement bias

Identifiers

PMID42111597
PMCPMC13149404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.