Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111571›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The serial mediation effects of parent-child relationships on juvenile delinquency: a nationwide analysis based on data from China's Recidivism Survey.

Qianqian Chen, Weihong Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qianqian ChenResearch Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Weihong SunResearch Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Juvenile delinquency has become an increasing concern in social governance, with the family, particularly the parent-child relationship, playing a central role in adolescent development and preventing antisocial behavior. However, the mechanisms linking parent-child relationships to delinquency, particularly in non-Western contexts, remain insufficiently understood. Methods: Using offender data from China's 2019 Recidivism Survey, this study examined whether parent-child relationships were associated with juvenile delinquency, defined as offending between ages 12 and 25. A serial mediation model was employed to test whether this association operated through self-control competence and deviant peer association, and whether the effect of self-control competence on juvenile delinquency differed by gender. Results: Results show that parent-child relationships are associated with juvenile delinquency directly and indirectly through self-control competence and deviant peer association. Relative to poor relationships, good and average parent-child relationships are associated with a lower likelihood of juvenile delinquency. Among mediators, deviant peer associations contribute the largest indirect effect. Gender moderation analyses indicate that self-control competence offers stronger protection against delinquency for males. Discussion: These findings contribute to integrated understanding of how family dynamics, individual self-regulation, and peer contexts are linked to juvenile delinquency and highlight the importance of supportive parent-child relationships for prevention.

Indexed as

deviant peer associationjuvenile delinquencyparent–child relationshipsself-control competenceserial mediation model

Identifiers

PMID42111571
PMCPMC13149233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.