Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Leadership, adaptation, and group resilience: a qualitative study of Bulgaria's 33rd Antarctic summer campaign.

Martin Milanov, Ivo Vlaev, Maria Stoicheva, Yavor Paunov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin MilanovDepartment of African Studies, Faculty of Classical and Modern Philology, Sofia University "Saint Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ivo VlaevCentre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions (BISI), NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Maria StoichevaEuropean Studies Department, Philosophy Faculty, Sofia University "Saint Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria.
Yavor PaunovDepartment of Economic and Consumer Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Antarctic field expeditions are isolated, confined, and extreme settings in which specialists must rapidly form effective teams to protect their wellbeing and to accomplish mission goals. We investigated leadership, team cohesion, group identity, and group-level motivation and coping during Bulgaria's 33rd Antarctic Summer Campaign using a longitudinal qualitative design. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted before departure ( Results: Participants described a marked transition from initial subgrouping (e.g., experienced vs. novice; scientific vs. logistics roles) toward a superordinate "one-station" identity. Leadership practices that emphasised transparent communication, mixed-group coordination, and active norm-setting were described by participants as supporting reduced friction and sustained collaboration. Motivation was generally high across the mission, with brief weather- and monotony-related dips that were buffered by humour, peer encouragement, and structured daily routines. Discussion: The findings highlight how shared purpose, interdependence, and identity-related leadership behaviours were perceived as supporting cohesion and adaptive coping in short-term polar campaigns.

Indexed as

adaptationAntarcticaexpeditionisolationleadershipmotivationpsychologyteam cohesion

Identifiers

PMID42111565
PMCPMC13152743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.