ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Real-time active surveillance for drug-induced Thrombocytopenia: A prospective interventional study.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a severe adverse drug event that is frequently missed due to overlapping causes, such as sepsis or other conditions. In Vietnam, the spontaneous reporting system for DITP events has shown limited benefits, highlighting the need for active surveillance methods such as real-time signal monitoring. Objective: To develop and implement a real-time signal monitoring tool for DITP in hospitalized patients with pharmacist-led interventions. Methods: We included inpatients aged ≥18 years admitted between March 1 and November 1, 2024. Suspected DITP cases were identified using an integrated set of signals from a real-time active surveillance tool. Pharmacists assessed drug-event causality using the World Health Organization causality scale and provided management recommendations. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for the alert. Results: 1337 positive signals were generated, involving 258 patients. Patients were predominantly male (66.7%) with a mean age of 65.1 (16.7) years, and most were admitted to the intensive care unit or emergency department. The overall PPV was 3.3%. Antibiotics were the most frequently suspected drug class associated with DITP, with confirmation rates varying by agent. Linezolid, heparin and meropenem had the highest confirmed associations, at 28.6%, 26.6% and 12.5%, respectively. In 17 cases with pharmacist intervention, drug discontinuation was documented in all cases, platelet transfusion in 3 patients, and recovery in 94.1% (16/17) of patients. Conclusion: Implementation of a real-time signal-based active surveillance system was associated with improved identification and structured assessment of suspected DITP cases, supporting the feasibility of routine active monitoring in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.