ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2026
Effect of Regional Anesthesia vs. General Anesthesia Technique on Perioperative Outcomes in Geriatric Patients With Hip Fracture: Narrative Review.
Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Regional Anesthesia vs. General Anesthesia Technique on Perioperative Outcomes in Geriatric Patients With Hip Fracture: Narrative Review.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising incidence of hip fractures in aging populations necessitates optimized perioperative management to mitigate complications. This narrative review evaluates the impact of regional anesthesia (RA) and analgesia techniques compared to general anesthesia (GA) on perioperative outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Current evidence reveals no consistent mortality benefit for RA over GA. Multicenter trials such as REGAIN and RAGA found no significant difference in 30- to 60-day survival. Similarly, spinal anesthesia does not show a clear superior advantage over GA on postoperative delirium (POD) in geriatric hip fracture patients. For pneumonia and other major complications, current evidence remains inconclusive, with more well-designed studies needed in the future. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including femoral block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group blocks, demonstrate superior perioperative analgesia by reducing opioid consumption and early pain scores. However, evidence on PNBs' effects on mortality or major complications remains limited. Overall, RA and GA exhibit comparable mortality outcomes, while PNBs enhance pain management but require further high-quality trials to assess long-term benefits. Current data highlight the need for individualized anesthesia strategies and robust RCTs to clarify optimal practices in high-risk geriatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.