ArticleMethodsX2026
Geographically weighted negative binomial regression for spatial count data: Methodology and application.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a reproducible methodological framework of Geographically Weighted Negative Binomial Regression (GWNBR) for modeling spatially overdispersed count data. The framework integrates Negative Binomial Regression (NBR) model with spatial weighting to capture overdispersion and spatial heterogeneity. The modeling procedure begins with Poisson regression, followed by an overdispersion test to justify the use of NBR. Spatial dependence and heterogeneity are then evaluated using Moran's I and Breusch-Pagan diagnostics. The GWNBR model is subsequently constructed using kernel-based spatial weighting with bandwidth selection through cross-validation. Model performance is assessed using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare Poisson, NBR, and GWNBR. A real-data application involving HIV case in Indonesia illustrates the capability of GWNBR to produce spatially localized estimates, offering enhanced interpretability and model accuracy over global approaches. This study contributes transparent and step-by-step analytical workflow that enhances reproducibility in spatial count data modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.