Article in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors.
SaiYu QiaoHebei Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun China https://ror.org/01a9z1q73.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9964-1352
Feng ZhangHebei Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun China https://ror.org/01a9z1q73.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-1031
Yaoguang QinHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China Hebei Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University Baoding China https://ror.org/01p884a79.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8954-0182
Yufeng ZhangHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China Hebei Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University Baoding China https://ror.org/01p884a79.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4066-6355
Huifeng ZhaoHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China Hebei Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University Baoding China https://ror.org/01p884a79.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-9671
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The
Indexed as
EarthwormIntegrative taxonomyOligochaetaSouthwest China
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.